Lauren Nwegbo - Director, Compliance Automation

Lauren Nwegbo

Director, Compliance Automation

“Design an environment where passing audits is simply a side effect of doing things right.”

Lauren Responds to Key Questions

What does compliance automation bring to the table that traditional GRC approaches don't?

Traditional GRC relies on spreadsheets, manual evidence collection, and periodic audits that provide a point-in-time view of compliance.

Compliance automation replaces this with policy-as-code, continuous control monitoring, and integration with cloud and CI/CD pipelines so controls are validated in real time and evidence is collected automatically.

This shifts compliance from a reactive reporting exercise to a continuous, engineering-driven function that improves accuracy, reduces manual overhead, and ensures constant audit readiness.

You've led audits across SOX, ISO, PCI-DSS, and HITRUST. What do companies misunderstand about managing multiple frameworks?

Many organizations treat each framework as a separate initiative, duplicating controls, evidence collection, and testing instead of recognizing that most frameworks share common control objectives.

Managing multiple frameworks can be challenging, but you can overcome this by engineering a unified control architecture where a single control can satisfy multiple regulatory requirements simultaneously.

When controls are designed and mapped appropriately, compliance becomes scalable, more efficient, and easier to sustain as regulatory demands evolve.

How do you prepare organizations for audits without the last-minute scramble?

Preparation begins with implementing continuous control monitoring so evidence is collected and validated as part of daily operations.

I design structured control ownership, automated evidence collection, and centralized repositories so documentation is always current and audit-ready. This turns audits into confirmation of an already well-governed environment.

You hold both ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 Lead Auditor certifications. Why does AI governance matter for companies that aren't "AI companies"?

AI governance matters because most organizations already use AI indirectly through cloud platforms, SaaS tools, and embedded vendor features, which introduce risks related to data exposure, model integrity, and regulatory accountability.

Without governance, companies lack visibility and control over how sensitive data is processed, how automated decisions are made, and whether those processes align with security and compliance requirements.

Establishing AI governance ensures organizations can safely adopt AI capabilities that meaningfully benefit their business.

What separates organizations that focus on passing audits from organizations that are actually secure?

Organizations focused on passing audits produce evidence to satisfy control requirements at a specific point in time. Truly secure organizations ensure those controls operate effectively and consistently in practice.

Security is defined by continuous enforcement, visibility, and rapid response to change, not just documented policies and periodic validation. The distinction lies in operationalizing controls as part of daily engineering and governance processes so compliance becomes a natural outcome of a genuinely secure environment.